Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts

Friday, September 12, 2008

Your Black World: The Express Path to Racial Equality

The Express Path to Racial Equality

By Dr. Boyce Watkins

www.BoyceWatkins.com

“The Express” is a new film featuring the great Ernie Davis, one of the most amazing college athletes in American History and the first African American to win the Heisman Trophy. He was also a football player for Syracuse University, the campus on which I teach.

I watched the trailer for the film with pride, feeling good about this man and what he accomplished. I saw all the ads, the banners around campus, the website pictures and other excitement as the city prepared for the film’s premiere. I then had a couple of thoughts.

First, I thought about the residual impact of historical racism. Most of the time, when liberal universities talk about racism, the context is one in which racism is something that happened “back then”, and “we are all better now”. The conversation is one of (relatively justifiable) celebration for just how far our nation has come in the fight for social justice.

What is most ironic about this analysis is that it forgets one important fact: the past is not something that existed once and then disappeared. The past is all around us. The present and past CANNOT be disconnected because the present is created by the past, and the past consistently manifests itself in the social infrastructure of our institutions. For example, in the days of Ernie Davis (not that long ago), African Americans were rarely allowed onto my campus (along with many others) and were certainly not allowed to be part of the decision-making bodies of these campuses. This led to a skewed inter-generational transfer of power that reflects itself in the vast degree of (in Georgetown University scholar Christopher Metzler’s words) “academic imperialism” that we see today. If you take a tour of most campuses, you see that there are few Black faces on the faculty, almost none of them tenured. Black students rarely have professors who look like themselves, as if their price of tuition is to embrace some degree of cultural dilution in their efforts to successfully assimilate. Black scholars are told that research on the Black community is “Ghetto scholarship” and effectively marginalized to departments that have little say in how the campus is run. The attitude is “This is our campus. History and tradition are everything here, and the tradition is that our rules apply and you need to just fit in where you can. We have no problem with you, as long as you remain grateful that we’ve allowed you into our house. Now, here’s a picture of one of our great black athletes to prove that we can’t be racist.”

The second thing I’ve noticed is what I call the “Old people effect” in dealing with historical racism. This effect is one that ideologically disconnects African Americans who attended college during the 60s and 70s from those who attended in the 90s and 00s. It is one where the campus shows tribute and respect to those who were mistreated 30 years ago, while simultaneously continuing the historical pattern of ostracism toward those who are the academic descendants of the older alumni. The “Old people effect” essentially says, “Yes, we will honor ex-athletes Art Monk and Ernie Davis, but they are nothing like the dangerous negroes Adam Banks and Boyce Watkins. Because we put a picture of Ernie Davis on our website, this clearly proves that we only hate the “bad” black men, which therefore justifies our desire to ostracize young African American scholars and students who choose to challenge our historical educational paradigm.” In other words, it’s like respecting the father of a family, but dishonoring him by beating his child. I am not sure there is any respect or honor in that. Also, one should realize that by honoring Davis and Monk but dishonoring their African American counterparts and intellectual descendants, you are effectively engaging in the historical act of celebrating well-behaved black athletes while demeaning progressive black intellectuals. The same can be said for the administrator who pats Carmello Anthony on the back while deliberately separating Anthony from the African American student activists across campus.

But truth be told, Syracuse is not much different from many campuses across America. The reality is that Americans are limited in our ability to fight racism, because many of us can’t even define it. We end up swinging at ghosts in the wind, believing that a more expensive Martin Luther King Celebration, attacking hate groups or inviting speakers from the Civil Rights era is our path to racial cleansing. The truth is that in order to truly fight institutionalized racism, you must be willing to engage in the painful act of surgically decomposing the subtle biases of your social, academic and economic infrastructure like a doctor committed to fighting cancer. The cancer of historical racism festers among us and, in some ways, has the greatest impact on those who truly believe they’ve been cured. Ineffective fights against racism (like giving a cancer patient the wrong drugs) lead to deformed efforts to fulfill Dr. King’s Dream, thus turning the dream into an even greater and more elusive nightmare for those under the thumb of such oppression.

It is my hope that “The Express” will inspire us to get off the express train for racial equality. 400-year old habits die hard, and it takes more than 25 years of good intentions to correct them.

Monday, April 7, 2008

The NCAA Championship Game: My quick observations

by Dr. Boyce Watkins
www.BoyceWatkins.com

I turned on the NCAA championship for a second to see some of the action. Due to the boycott, I don’t watch too much of the March Madness stuff, especially the commercials. But the game, from what I saw, seemed pretty good.
Here is what I noticed during the game:

Over 90% of the points were scored by black players
The black players were the reason that the NCAA surely earned at least $40 million dollars from one game.

Had the black players not shown up, the game would have never taken place.
Both of the coaches, each of whom earn millions from college sports, are white.
When all of these guys end their college careers and attempt to get head coaching jobs at these same universities to whom they’ve given so much, odds say they will be denied the job.

The player of the year award went to a white player at The University of North Carolina who was clearly dominated in the game before the championship. He’s a great player, but won’t be selected first in the NBA draft. Had he been black, he would not have gotten that award. The same thing happened to Shaquille O’neal in 1992 when Christian Laetner of Duke received all the player of the year awards. Everyone knew clearly that the NCAA’s most dominant player that year was O’neal, and their careers in the NBA confirmed that reality.

Most telling is that a coach who wins games and does not graduate players will get a job over a coach who graduates players and does not win games. This is a clear reflection of the hypocrisy apparent at many of these so-called “academic” institutions. Educating athletes is far less important than getting them on the court; this fact is made clear by the incentive structure of coaching compensation schemes.

The NCAA is racist. That’s all there is to it. I would love to see the black players boycott the championship. Their mothers deserve a cut of that money, not just the coaches.

Video: Why the NCAA is Racist and Why Black Athletes Need to Boycott